Search for: All records

Abstract BackgroundComputational cell type deconvolution enables the estimation of cell type abundance from bulk tissues and is important for understanding tissue microenviroment, especially in tumor tissues. With rapid development of deconvolution methods, many benchmarking studies have been published aiming for a comprehensive evaluation for these methods. Benchmarking studies rely on cell-type resolved single-cell RNA-seq data to create simulated pseudobulk datasets by adding individual cells-types in controlled proportions. ResultsIn our work, we show that the standard application of this approach, which uses randomly selected single cells, regardless of the intrinsic difference between them, generates synthetic bulk expression values that lack appropriate biological variance. We demonstrate why and how the current bulk simulation pipeline with random cells is unrealistic and propose a heterogeneous simulation strategy as a solution. The heterogeneously simulated bulk samples match up with the variance observed in real bulk datasets and therefore provide concrete benefits for benchmarking in several ways. We demonstrate that conceptual classes of deconvolution methods differ dramatically in their robustness to heterogeneity with reference-free methods performing particularly poorly. For regression-based methods, the heterogeneous simulation provides an explicit framework to disentangle the contributions of reference construction and regression methods to performance. Finally, we perform an extensive benchmark of diverse methods across eight different datasets and find BayesPrism and a hybrid MuSiC/CIBERSORTx approach to be the top performers. ConclusionsOur heterogeneous bulk simulation method and the entire benchmarking framework is implemented in a user friendly packagehttps://github.com/humengying0907/deconvBenchmarkingandhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8206516, enabling further developments in deconvolution methods. 

Abstract SummaryComputational cell-type deconvolution is an important analytic technique for modeling the compositional heterogeneity of bulk gene expression data. A conceptually new Bayesian approach to this problem, BayesPrism, has recently been proposed and has subsequently been shown to be superior in accuracy and robustness against model misspecifications by independent studies; however, given that BayesPrism relies on Gibbs sampling, it is orders of magnitude more computationally expensive than standard approaches. Here, we introduce the InstaPrism package which re-implements BayesPrism in a derandomized framework by replacing the time-consuming Gibbs sampling step with a fixed-point algorithm. We demonstrate that the new algorithm is effectively equivalent to BayesPrism while providing a considerable speed and memory advantage. Furthermore, the InstaPrism package is equipped with a precompiled, curated set of references tailored for a variety of cancer types, streamlining the deconvolution process. Availability and implementationThe package InstaPrism is freely available at: https://github.com/humengying0907/InstaPrism. The source code and evaluation pipeline used in this paper can be found at: https://github.com/humengying0907/InstaPrismSourceCode.